Photosynthetica 1997, 33(12):249-256 | DOI: 10.1023/A:1006896708742

Photosynthesis and water relations of almond tree cultivars grafted on two rootstocks

M.C. Matos1, A.A. Matos1, A. Mantas2, V. Cordeiro2, J.B. Vieira Da Silva3
1 Departamento de Fisiologia Vegetal, Estação Agronómica Nacional, Oeiras, Portugal
2 Direcção Regional de Agricultura de Trás-os-Montes, Mirandela, Portugal
3 Laboratoire d'Ecologie Génerale et Appliquée, Université Denis Diderot, Paris Cedex 05, France

Five cultivars of Prunus amygdalus Batsch (Ferragnes, Ferrastar, Marcona, Garrigues, and Non Pareil) grafted on two different rootstocks (Garrigues and GF677), and two cultivars (Ferraduel and Casa Nova) grafted on GF677, were grown for three years under rainfed conditions in an orchard in northeast Portugal. Net photosynthetic rate (PN), leaf conductance for water vapour (gs), leaf water potential (Ψ), instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE), and internal CO2 concentration (Ci) were measured at three periods of the growing season: spring, summer (June or July) and late summer (September) over two years. Ferraduel, Ferrastar, and Marcona presented the best performance in the periods when environmental conditions were not very hard (May or September). Casa Nova and Non Pareil were well adapted to high air evaporative demand, preventing the increase of leaf temperature (T1). Ferrastar, although having a good performance in May and September, did well adapt to hard climatic conditions in June 1994. In the following year, although it presented the highest T1, the values were not limiting (30.6 ± 2.1 °C), and PN was only decreased from May to July. Marcona was highly dependent on T1, but prevented its increasing. Garrigues showed lower PN in most measurement periods. GF677 frequently induced the highest PN, WUE, and Ψ. PN was mainly dependent on T1, radiation, Ci, month, and year. WUE depended on the same factors. Ψ depended mainly on gs, air temperature, month, and year.

Prepublished online: January 1, 1998; Published: March 1, 1997  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Matos, M.C., Matos, A.A., Mantas, A., Cordeiro, V., & Da Silva, J.B.V. (1997). Photosynthesis and water relations of almond tree cultivars grafted on two rootstocks. Photosynthetica, 34(2), 249-256. doi: 10.1023/A:1006896708742
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Barden, J.A., Ferree, D.C.: Rootstock does not affect net photosynthesis, dark respiration, specific leaf weight, and transpiration of apple leaves.-J. amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 104: 526-528, 1979. Go to original source...
    2. Bongi, G., Palliotti, A., Rocchi, P., Roselli, G.: Evaluation of water use efficiency in peach grafted on different interspecific hybrid rootstocks.-Plant Physiol. Biochem. 32: 149-157, 1994.
    3. Caemmerer, S. von, Farquhar, G.D.: Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves.-Planta 153: 376-387, 1981. Go to original source...
    4. Cristoferi, G., Fabbri, O., Pernicone, G.: [Report on vigour, conductivity for water, and anatomical structure of stems of apple trees EM IX and EM IV.]-Riv. Ortoflorofruttic. ital. 47: 146-150, 1963. [In Ital.]
    5. Elfving, D.C., Kaufmann, M.R., Hall, A.E.: Interpreting leaf water potential measurements with a model of the soil-plant atmosphere continuum.-Physiol. Plant. 27: 161-168, 1972. Go to original source...
    6. El-Motaium, R., Hu, H., Brown, H.: The relative tolerance of six Prunus rootstocks to boron and salinity.-J. amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 119: 1169-1175, 1994. Go to original source...
    7. Fereres, E., Aldrich, T.M., Schulbach, H., Martinich, D.A.: Responses of young almond trees to late season drought.-California Agr. 35: 11-12, 1981.
    8. Ferree, M.E., Barden, J.A.: The influence of strains and rootstocks on photosynthesis, respiration and morphology of "Delicious" apple trees.-J. amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 85: 453-457, 1971. Go to original source...
    9. Gall, H., Grasselly, C.: Essai de comportement de 12 variétés d'amandier greffées sur amandier, pecher et pecher × amandier.-3o Colloque du G.R.E.M.P.A., Bari 1977.
    10. Grasselly, C., Crossa-Raynaud, P.: L'Amandier.-G.P. Maisonneuve & Larouse, Paris 1980.
    11. Klepper, B.: Diurnal pattern of water potential in wood plants.-Plant Physiol. 43: 1931-1934, 1968. Go to original source...
    12. Marro, M., Cereghini, F.: Observations on various morphological and functional aspects of spurs on Richared apples on seedlings and M9 rootstocks.-Riv. Ortoflorofrutic. ital. 60: 1-14, 1976.
    13. Matos, M.C.: A economia da água da macicira. Aplicação ao controlo da rega. [Water Economy of Apple Tree. Application in Irrigation Control.]-PhD. Thesis. Univ. Lisboa. Lisboa 1990. [In Portugal.]
    14. Meidner, H.: Effects of photoperiodic induction and debudding in Xanthium pensylvanicum and of partial defoliation in Phaseolus vulgaris on rates of net photosynthesis and stomatal conductances.-J. exp. Bot. 21: 164-169, 1970. Go to original source...
    15. Ross, N., Catlin P.: Rootstocks and root physiology.-In: Almond Orchard Management. Division of Agricultural Science, University of California, 1978.
    16. Ruiz-Sánchez, M.C., Torrecillas, A., Del Amor, F., Leon, A., Abrisqueta, J.M.: Leaf water potential and leaf conductance during the growing season in almond trees under different irrigation regimes.-Biol. Plant. 30: 327-332, 1988. Go to original source...
    17. Scholander, P.F., Hammel, H.T., Bradstreet, G., Hemminggen, E.A.: Sap pressure in vascular plants.-Science 148: 339-346, 1965. Go to original source...
    18. Torrecillas, A., Ruiz-Sanchez, M.C., Del Amor, F., Leon, A.: Seasonal variations on water relations of Amygdalus communis L. under drip irrigated and non irrigated conditions.-Plant Soil 106: 215-220, 1988. Go to original source...

    Return to the content