Photosynthetica 2019, 57(1):121-131 | DOI: 10.32615/ps.2019.016

Osmotic adjustment, stomata morphology and function show contrasting responses to water stress in mesic and hydric grasses under elevated CO2 concentration

S.W. MWENDIA1, I.A.M. YUNUSA2,3, B.M. SINDEL2, R.D.B. WHALLEY2, J.J. BRUHL2
1 International Center for Tropical Agriculture, Africa Regional Office, P.O. Box 823-00621, Nairobi, Kenya
2 School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University, Panorama Avenue, Bathurst NSW 2795, Australia

The physiological response of two species of grasses with C3 and C4 mechanisms syndromes, Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach × Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br) and hydric common reed grass (Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex Steud) was examined under ambient (aCO2) and elevated CO2 (eCO2), in combination with water and temperature stress treatments. Under eCO2 and subjected to water and temperature stress, the Napier grass maintained higher daytime leaf water potential (LWP) by reducing transpiration (E) and executing larger osmotic adjustment (OA) at an average of 0.85 MPa compared with 0.42 MPa for common reed; carbon assimilation (PN) was thus higher for the Napier grass. Under aCO2 and low temperature, water stress induced no significant differences in OA between the grasses, but Napier grass still had higher PN than that of common reed. Recovery in LWP and PN following re-watering of water-stressed plants was more rapid in Napier grass than that in the common reed; the former had also higher water-use efficiency due to its low specific water use (water use/leaf area) that was just a fraction (less than 6%) that of the common reed. Exposure of common reed to eCO2 reduced stomata number, but increased it in the Napier grass, especially when subjected to water stress and high temperature. Exposure to eCO2 enhanced OA capacity and E control in Napier grass resulting in superior physiological profile over the common reed subjected to water and heat stress.

Additional key words: heat stress; leaf water potential; water-use efficiency.

Received: February 22, 2018; Accepted: July 4, 2018; Prepublished online: December 7, 2018; Published: January 30, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
MWENDIA, S.W., YUNUSA, I.A.M., SINDEL, B.M., WHALLEY, R.D.B., & BRUHL, J.J. (2019). Osmotic adjustment, stomata morphology and function show contrasting responses to water stress in mesic and hydric grasses under elevated CO2 concentration. Photosynthetica, 57(1), 121-131. doi: 10.32615/ps.2019.016
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Aranda I., Puértolas J., Pardos M. et al.: Elevated atmospheric CO2 does not modify osmotic adjustment to light and drought in the Mediterranean Oak Quercus suber L. - Invest Agrar-Sist R. 17: 3-9, 2008. Go to original source...
    2. Bajji M., Lutts S., Kinet J.: Water deficit effects on solute contribution to osmotic adjustment as a function of leaf ageing in three durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) cultivars performing differently in arid conditions. - Plant Sci. 160: 669-681, 2001. Go to original source...
    3. Bernacchi C.J., Kimball B.A., Quarles D.R. et al.: Decreases in stomatal conductance of soybean under open air elevation of CO2 are closely coupled with decreases in ecosystem evapotranspiration. - Plant Physiol. 143: 134-144, 2007. Go to original source...
    4. Blum A., Munns R., Passioura J.B., et al.: Genetically engineered plants resistant to soil drying and salt stress: how to interpret osmotic relations. - Plant Physiol. 110: 1051-1053, 1996. Go to original source...
    5. Boonman J.G.: East Africa's Grasses and Fodders, their Ecology and Husbandry. Pp. 350. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht 1993. Go to original source...
    6. Bunce J.A.: Carbon dioxide effects on stomatal responses to the environment and water-use by crops under field conditions. - Oecologia 140: 1-10, 2004. Go to original source...
    7. Carmargo M.A.B., Arenco R.A.M.: Density, size and distribution of stomata in 35 rain forest tree species in Central Amazonia. - Acta Amazon. 41: 205-212, 2011. Go to original source...
    8. Eamus D., Jarvis P.G.: The direct effects of increase in the global CO2 concentration on natural and commercial temperate trees and forests. - Adv. Ecol. Res. 19: 1-55, 1989. Go to original source...
    9. Fernandéz R.J., Wang M., Reynolds J.F.: Do morphological changes mediate plant responses to water-stress? A steady-state experiment with two C4 grasses. - New Phytol. 155: 79-88, 2002. Go to original source...
    10. Ghannoum O.: C4 photosynthesis and water-stress. - Ann. Bot.-London 103: 635-644, 2009. Go to original source...
    11. Giridhar K., Samireddypalle A.: Impact of climate change on forage availability for livestock. - In: Sejian V., Gaughan J., Baumgard L., Prasad C. (ed.): Climate Change Impact on Livestock: Adaptation and Mitigation. Pp. 97-112. Springer, New Delhi 2015. Go to original source...
    12. Gucker C.L.: Phragmites australis. - In: Fire Effects Information System, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. - Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/, 2008.
    13. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report, 2014. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/SYR_AR5_SPMcorr1.pdf [accessed 19 December 2017].
    14. Kamaluldeen J., Yunusa I., Zerihun A. et al.: Uptake and distribution of ions reveal contrasting tolerance mechanisms for soil and water salinity in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) and tomato (Solanum esculentum). - Agr. Water Manage. 146: 95-104, 2014. Go to original source...
    15. Karkanis A., Bilalis D., Efthimiadou A.: Architectural plasticity, photosynthesis and growth responses of velvet leaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medicus) to water-stress in a semiarid environment. - Aust. J. Crop Sci. 5: 369-374, 2011.
    16. Klingebiel A.A., Montgomery P.H.: Land Capability Classification. Agriculture Handbook No. 210. Pp. 1-25. US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC 1961.
    17. Knapp A.K., Cocke M., Hamerlynck E.P. et al.: Effect of elevated CO2 on stomatal density and distribution in a C4 grass and a C3 forb under field conditions. - Ann. Bot.-London 74: 595-599, 1994. Go to original source...
    18. Köbbing J.F., Thevs N., Zerbe S.: The utilisation of reed (Phragmites australis): a review. - Mires Peat 13: 1-14, 2013.
    19. Lambers H., Chapin F.S., Pins T.L.: Plant Physiological Ecology. Pp. 101-223. Springer Science, New York 2008. Go to original source...
    20. Lammertsma E.I., de Boer H.J., Dekker S.C. et al.: Global CO2 rise leads to reduced maximum stomatal conductance in Florida vegetation. - P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108: 4035-4040, 2011. Go to original source...
    21. Lecain D.R., Morgan J.A., Mosier A.M. et al.: Soil and plant water relations determine photosynthetic responses of C3 and C4 grasses in a semi-arid ecosystem under elevated CO2. - Ann. Bot.-London 92: 41-52, 2003. Go to original source...
    22. Liu W., Liu G., Zhang Q.: Shoreline vegetation in the Danjiangkou reservoir: Characteristics, related factors, and differences with adjacent riverine wetlands. - Clean-Soil Air Water 42: 1014-1021, 2014. Go to original source...
    23. Lopes M.S., Araus J.L., van Heerden P.D.R. et al.: Enhancing drought tolerance in C4 crops. - J. Exp. Bot. 62: 3135-3153, 2011. Go to original source...
    24. Mallett K., Orchard O.E.: Flora of Australia, Vol. 43, Poaceae 1, Introduction and Atlas. Pp. 307. CSIRO Publishing, Clayton 2002.
    25. Minitab Inc.: Minitab Statistical Software, release 15 for Windows. Minitab Inc. State College, Pennsylvania 2007.
    26. Morgan J.A., Lecain D.R, Mosier A.R. et al.: Elevated CO2 enhances water relations and productivity and affects gas exchange in C3 and C4 grasses of the Colorado shortgrass steppe. - Glob. Change Biol. 7: 451-466, 2001. Go to original source...
    27. Mozdzer T.J., Zieman J.C.: Ecophysiological differences between genetic lineages facilitate the invasion of non-native Phragmites australis in North American coast wetlands. - J. Ecol. 98: 451-458, 2010. Go to original source...
    28. Mwendia S.W., Yunusa I.A.M., Sindel B.M. et al.: Assessment of Napier grass accessions in lowland and highland tropical environments in east Africa: Productivity and forage quality. - Exp. Agr. 53: 27-43, 2016. Go to original source...
    29. Mwendia S.W., Yunusa I.A.M., Sindel B.M. et al.: Assessment of Napier grass accessions in lowland and highland tropical environments in east Africa: water stress indices, water use and water use efficiency. - J Sci Food Agric. 97: 1953-1961, 2017. Go to original source...
    30. Nilsen E.T., Sharifi M.R., Rundel P.W. et al.: Diurnal and seasonal water relations of the desert phreatophyte Prosopis glandulosa (honey mesquite) in the Sonoran desert of California. - Ecology 64: 1381-1393, 1983. Go to original source...
    31. Ocheltree T.W., Nippert J.B., Prasad P.V.V.: Stomatal responses to changes in vapour pressure deficit reflect tissue-specific differences in hydraulic conductance. - Plant Cell Environ. 37: 132-139, 2013. Go to original source...
    32. Paoletti E., Gellini R.: Stomatal density variation in beech and holm Oak leaves collected over 200 years. - Acta Oecol-Oec Plant. 14: 173-178, 1993.
    33. Pearcy R.W., Berry J.A., Bartholoomew B.: Field photosynthetic performance and leaf temperatures of Phragmites communis under summer conditions in Death Valley, California. - Photosynthetica 8: 104-108, 1974.
    34. Quian Y.L., Fry J.D.: Water relations and drought tolerance of four turfgrasses. - J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 122: 129-133, 1997. Go to original source...
    35. Ripley B.S., Gilbert M.E., Ibrahim D.G. et al.: Drought constraints on C4 photosynthesis: stomatal and metabolic limitations in C3 and C4 subspecies of Alloteropsis semialata. - J. Exp. Bot. 58: 1351-1363, 2007. Go to original source...
    36. Tricker P.J., Trewin H., Kull O. et al.: Stomatal conductance and not stomatal density determines the long-term reduction in leaf transpiration of poplar in elevated CO2. - Oecologia 143: 652-660, 2005. Go to original source...
    37. Tudsri S., Jorgensen S.T., Riddach P. et al.: Effects of cutting height and dry season closing date on yield and quality of five Napier grass cultivars in Thailand. - Trop. Grasslands 36: 248-252, 2002.
    38. Tyree M.T., Alexander J.D.: Plant water relations and the effects of elevated CO2: a review and suggestions for future research. - Vegetatio 104: 47-62,1993. Go to original source...
    39. Wall G.W., Brooks T.J., Adam R. et al.: Elevated atmospheric CO2 improved sorghum plant water status by ameliorating the adverse effects of drought. - New Phytol. 152: 231-248, 2001. Go to original source...
    40. Ward J.K., Tissue D.T., Thomas R.B. et al.: Comparative responses of model C3 and C4 plants to drought in low and elevated CO2. - Glob. Change Biol. 5: 857-867, 1999. Go to original source...
    41. Yunusa I.A.M., Aumann C.D., Rab M.A. et al.: Topographical and seasonal trends in transpiration by two co-occurring Eucalyptus species during two contrasting years in a low rainfall environment. - Agr. Forest Meteorol. 150: 1234-1244, 2010. Go to original source...

    Return to the content